Category: Mixing Studies
From Ali Sadeghi-Khomami: Hi George, I read Dave McGlasson’s paper with great interest. In brief, his case had the following results:
|PTT 2 h 37°C incubation||>200s|
|Platelet neutralization (PNP)||Positive|
|Kaolin clotting time (KCT)||>200s|
- The article didn’t mention anything about a prolonged PT mix but just PTT have done that way.
- The PNP positive, could be a false positive due to factor V release from platelets.
- Later follow up: DRVVT screen and confirm both positive
- Staclot-LA negative, no data provided other than result on your site.
Yesterday, January 21, 2014, I posted “Incubated PT Mixing Studies?” in response to Lori Pinelli, and mentioned a patient Dave McGlasson worked up who had a Keflex-induced anti-factor V. The post attracted a comment from my colleague at Precision BioLogic Inc, Ali Sadeghi-Khomami, PhD, and just a few moments ago I added a comment emailed to me by Chris Ferrell at University of Washington Harborview. Both comments are insightful and provocative. As they say on TVLand, “BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE!”
From Lori Pinelli, Glens Falls Hospital: Hello George. Our current prothrombin time (PT) mixing time procedure only includes running the initial 1:1 mix along with the patient and the normal pooled plasma (NPP). Twice in the past year, I have been asked to perform an incubated PT mix in addition to the initial analysis. Both patients had normal activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs, PTTs) and elevated PTs. They were both factor VII deficient and corrected upon addition of NPP. I was asked to perform the incubated mix to rule out an inhibitor. Are there time/heat dependent Factor VII inhibitors? Should I be routinely performing the incubated mix for PT correction studies? Thank you!
From Kathleen Tobertga: Hello, We are having problems between sites with the results of our 2 hour normal pooled plasma (NPP) control (unmixed) for our mixing studies. Our site (the main lab) is getting an increased value for the PTT around 40 s, which we have researched and seems to be elevated due to heat labile factors being destroyed. The other site is getting normal results for their 2 hour incubated NPP control (~32 secs). We are trying everything to figure out what is going on short of actually going over there and performing the testing ourselves. We are both using the same company for the pooled plasma, they are thawing at 37°C, we at room temp. Tommorow we will be trying to replicate each other’s thawing techinque to see if that is the variable. What I’d like to know, because I could only find it in one resource, are we correct about the heat labile factors and that the 2 hour incubated control should be increased, and do you have any place I can go to find documentation? Would be much appreciated. Thank you.
From Louise Pleiss, MT (ASCP), Southcoast Medical Group: We recently changed our mixing study procedure to include rerunning of the normal pooled plasma (NPP) after a 2 hour incubation as one of our system controls, but we are having a difference of opinion about what should happen to the NPP. One site says that the partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, PTT) will increase to about 42 s due to heat labile factors. Our site does not agree and we think we should get nearly the same value as when we first ran the NPP before incubation. Do you have any data to support either side? Thank you.
From Kim Kinney, IU Health in Indianapolis: We offer mixing studies all shifts, 24/7. If not ordered STAT, we call the floor and ask if it can be set up the next day. Do other institutions run mixes 24/7 regardless of status or just STAT’s? Our PM and night folks are short-handed and have a large workload! Kim, to encourage responses, I’ve arranged to post this as my next Quick Question. Check back by Thursday, the new question should appear. Meanwhile, I invite comments below.
By the way, are your mixing studies ordered from the unit or do you reflex? Geo.
Educators face the issue of limited resources, so Medical Laboratory Science schools are able to illustrate only basic coagulation concepts in the student lab. George monitors the MLS Educators’ list, CLSEDUC, and came across this helpful suggestion from Program Director Michele Harms, MS, MLS. Michele gave me permission to reproduce the message and her laboratory procedure, attached at the end.
Read more »